Matrix
● product bound to the same vendor's ERP · ✓ integration stated in sources · blank: not stated in sources (does not mean unavailable)
Checked: 2026-09-18. Click a row name to see its sources.
Solutions whose sources do not name an integration with a specific ERP: AKINSOFT — WOLVOX ERP warehouse and stock management, Blue Yonder (formerly JDA) — WMS, DepoIO, Generix Group, Infor — WMS, Manhattan Associates, Mantis (LV3), MySYS — 3PL Prep Center WMS, Netadam — Net-X WMS, Omniful — WMS, Univera — StokBar
How to read the table
- ✓ means integration with that ERP is explicitly stated on the solution's official website, documentation or vendor statement. Sources are listed on each solution's directory profile.
- ● marks the ERP vendor's own warehouse solution (e.g. Logo WMS from Logo). These products can offer the deepest integration with that ERP but are usually not used with other ERPs.
- A blank cell does not mean there is no integration; it only means we could not find it in public sources. Many WMSs can connect to unnamed ERPs through APIs or middleware.
- The “ERP (not named)” column shows solutions whose sources mention ERP integration without naming the ERP.
What does “ready-made integration” mean?
Vendors use the word “integrated” in different ways: a connector shipped with the standard product and maintained by the vendor, an interface built for a previous project that needs adapting, or merely the existence of an API. Cost and risk differ markedly between the three.
Features that make integration easier
- REST APIs and standard data exchange: Defined services exchange item, order, inventory and shipment data. An API alone is not a ready-made ERP connector; check the supported operations and whether data can flow in both directions.
- Ready-made connectors and process templates: Connections prepared for specific ERP products and versions can reduce development for receiving orders, outbound orders, inventory movements and returns. Separate standard flows from those requiring custom development.
- Visual field mapping and data transformation: Mapping ERP item codes, warehouses, units, customers and document fields to their WMS equivalents through a screen simplifies configuration. Ask how transformations, required fields and validation rules are defined.
- Webhooks and event notifications: Completing a receipt or preparing an order for dispatch can trigger a notification to another system. This can reduce polling; assess event coverage, delivery latency and retry behavior separately.
- Message queues and duplicate prevention: Durable queues and retry policies help transfers resume after temporary outages. Check idempotency controls that prevent duplicate orders or inventory movements when a message is processed again, and how processing order is preserved.
- API documentation and a test environment: OpenAPI/Swagger definitions, sample requests, error codes and a sandbox help technical teams understand and test the connection before go-live. Evaluate how closely the test environment represents actual workflows.
- Middleware and alternative connections: Integration platforms (iPaaS), EDI or controlled file transfers may be options for systems with limited API coverage. Evaluate transaction volume, latency needs, maintenance ownership and total cost rather than novelty alone.
- Monitoring, reconciliation and secure access: Transfer status, error details and reprocessing options should be visible in one place. ERP–WMS inventory reconciliation, connection permissions, encrypted communication and API version management also determine long-term maintainability.
How do you verify fast deployment? Request a reference using the same ERP version, a list of exchanged operations, an end-to-end test with sample data and a go-live plan with named owners. A ready connector can shorten delivery, but ERP customizations, data quality, additional licences and acceptance testing affect the overall timeline. Newer technology alone does not guarantee faster integration.
Technical references: Oracle WMS REST API, the OpenAPI specification and Microsoft’s event messaging guidance. These are general evaluation criteria, not a claim that every product in the matrix supports them all.
| Ask the vendor | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is the integration part of the standard product or built per project? | Project-specific integrations are priced separately and carry risk during upgrades. |
| With which version of your ERP, and at how many customers, is it live? | Different versions of the same ERP may use different interfaces. |
| Which documents and movements are exchanged (orders, delivery notes, stock, returns)? In which direction and how often? | A connection described as “integrated” may cover only part of the flow. |
| Is development or an extra licence needed on the ERP side? Whose responsibility is it? | This item is often left out of proposals. |
| How are messages monitored and resent when something fails? | Unnoticed integration errors are the most common problem in production. |
Once your ERP is known, select it in the WMS finder to exclude products bound to another ERP, and see the remaining candidates side by side on the comparison page. Use section 5 of the RFP template to put integration questions to vendors in the same format.
If you are a vendor and your integration details are missing or wrong, update them through the directory listing form or send a source to info@wmsturkiye.com to request a correction.
Frequently asked questions
Should I buy a separate WMS when my ERP has a warehouse module?
It depends on operational complexity. If you need location-level work, task management, wave planning and labour measurement, most ERP modules fall short. For a single site with simple flows, a separate product means integration effort and a second version of the truth about stock.
How long does integration take?
A ready-made connector can shorten integration, but the ERP version and customizations, required operations, data quality and acceptance tests determine the overall timeline. Request a reference project on the same ERP version, the standard connector scope and a go-live plan with named owners.
Which system should hold the stock?
Location-level truth inside the warehouse belongs in the WMS, financial stock in the ERP, and the two must reconcile. What matters is writing down how and how often reconciliation happens; left undefined, discrepancies inevitably build up.
Method and corrections: editorial policy.